Facebook vs Twitter Case Study Analysis Essay

Facebook (originally The facebook) is a social networking website launched in February 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg, then 23, objet dart studying psychology at Harvard University. Membership was initially limited to students of Harvard College, but soon the social site was subsequently ext finaleed to other Boston universities, the ivy League and eventually all US universities (Yadav, 2006). It became Facebook. com in August 2005 after the sites address was obtained for a relatively meager $200,000. By the end of the following year it was also open to high schools.As of September 2006, Facebook was extended beyond educational associations to anybody with a registered email address. They seduce over clxxv million active users worldwide latestly and are growing every day. Facebooks mission statement seems simple Facebooks mission is to give sight the power to share and make the world more open and connected (Reagan, 2009). chirp still no business model but it has a new-made mission st atement To instantly connect people everywhere to whats more or less important to them. (Evans, 2011). Who is better than who? Or one could say who is going to be the king of the hill?Facebook has tried to purchase Twitter with no success. It is hard to say who will come emerge on top or who will be the ultimate winner of the social war. There are some key differences between the sites (Lacy, 2009). Its far easier to find people on Facebook and most of the succession you can tell if its actually them. Facebook and Twitter are both free sites and are both popular. Facebook and Twitter are both time conversations, but Twitter is a little faster. They both seem to have their good and bad qualities. Twitter has a character restriction and has no popups. Twitter users can also post to their Facebook page.Facebook does non have a character limit. They both can post pictures and videos, but Facebook has more capacity for sharing videos and photos without forcing you to bind out to so me other window (Lacy, 2009). Facebook has a better privacy blocking system, if you can find it with the ever changing improvements. A lot of users are not aware of this option. Facebook allows businesses to advertise and reach more people faster. Facebook makes there revenue off the ads on their site, witch keeps it free for their users. Facebook has games for their users to play as well.These games also amaze some of their revenue. Twitter has no games and the only source of revenue is its investors. Facebook is threatened with losing users to a less familiar, social networking website. The major problem that exists is the fact that Twitter has a controlled level of social networking. Facebook does not allow one way interaction options meaning that if I want to follow someones posts then they themselves would have to accept my friend request, and Facebook also does not allow someone to track real time information is always adding improvements that the client base does not like.Wi th this casualty it may mean that many Facebook members may leave and start using twitter because of some of the restrictions that are placed on the members of Facebook. The first alternative resolving is for Facebook to purchase stellar star technology and offer the capability to track real-time information. This solution will help to eliminate Twitters current advantage of having the capability to track real-time information. Another alternative solution is to develop a way for one-way relationships to be possible on Facebook, trance maintaining its security.Many users want to broadcast their status information, but not actually follow all of their status viewers and get somewhat irritated with the function of game postings that clog up their pages. I know I do to the point that I log off and sometimes go and check out Twitter. In conclusion, there will never be a happy medium here. Technology is constantly evolving and there will probably be another social network that will b e created and pose threats to both of these networks.In my opinion, Facebook is more personal, whereas Twitter is more Hollywood. Facebook deals with contacting old friends and family members and Twitter is about following an entertainer. Myspace is only out of space as there arent really too many users out there anymore. LinkedIn is a way to network via business and doesnt contain the content that any of these sites do, as it wouldnt be professional. Facebook will definitely be around for a long time, as will Twitter. some cant have one without the other, I know I cant.