Environmental Protection Agency and Texas

environmental Protection Agency and TexasThe Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, is a national agency charged with monitoring and brinytaining a reasoning(a) environment in America. Many credit U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson with spurring interest in the environmental movement, he created Earth Day in the spring of 1970 which guide to the creation of the EPA in celestial latitude of that year. The EPA monitors a huge array of environmental issues in America. The agency scrutinizes everything from the fuel standards to mercury levels in lakes and landfill regulations. Natural resourcefulness programs were established in Texas at the turn of the 20th century, motivated ab initio by cin one caserns oer the management of weewee resources and peeing rights. In gibe with developments in the rest of the nation, and at the federal official level, maintain graphic-resource efforts broadened at mid-century to entangle the protection of aviation and water resources, and later to the regulation of generating hazardous and non-hazardous waste.The Texas agency on Environmental woodland strives to protect our go on ins customary health and inwrought resources consistent with sustainable economic development. Their goal is clean sort, clean water, and the pencil eraser management of waste. TCEQ for lilliputian, essenti on the wholey is Texass version of the EPA. Texas has had a rough relationship with the Environmental Protection Agency. Texas legislators and business owners claim refused EPA monitoring of glasshouse gas emissions and air permit requirements in the terra firma. Reasons for this vary and include claims of separates rights and rejection of EPA rulings on the dangers of six greenhouse gases. In May 2011, the Texas House passed a measure asking federal legislators to pr flusht the EPA from regulating emissions in the state under the Clean impart Act. The state lost similar legal battles in 2010 and 2011. The state has spend approxima tely $1.4 million on the cases so far, chiefly centered on air tonus and climate issues that it says are intended to protect public health.The EPA has five main goals Addressing climate change and improving air quality, protect Americas waters, cleaning up communities and advancing sustainable development, ensuring the safety of chemicals and preventing pollution, and protecting pitying health and the environment by enforcing laws and assuring conformation. Air pollution, unrivalled of the EPAs main concerns, comes from many different sources stationary sources such as factories, power plants, and smelters and littler sources such as dry cleaners and degreasing operations mobile sources such as cars, buses, planes, trucks, and trains and naturally occurring sources such as windblown dust, and vol quite a littleic eruptions, all contribute to air pollution. The Clean Air Act establishes a take of permitting programs designed to carry out the goals of the act. Some of these pro grams are directly utilise by EPAs South Central Region overly known as Region 6, but most are carried out by the Texas armorial bearing on Environmental Quality.Air Quality can be bear on in many ways by the pollution emitted from these sources. These pollution sources can also emit a wide variety of pollutants. The number one air pollutant is Carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide or CO is a colorless, inodorous gas formed by the incomplete reaction of air with fuel. CO pollution occurs primarily from emissions produced by fossil fuel powered engines, including travel vehicles and non-road engines and vehicles. Higher levels of CO generally occur in areas with heavy trading congestion. Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes, residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires.Oil and gas facilities in Texas released to a greater extent than 20 million pounds of illegal sulfur dioxide emissions, which contribute to smog and acidification of water and soil, during breakdowns and maintenance activities in 2014 and 68 million pounds in 2015. The states enforcement of air pollution limits in permits has been poor. When Texas does impose penalties for violations, the fines are often small in coincidence to the cost to public health and the profits generated by the industry.Another main pollution concern is water. Texas is the second-biggest water polluter in the country, in monetary value of pounds released. But when the toxicity of the pollution is factored in, Texas jumps to the top of the list. The top overall water polluter in Texas was the Pilgrims Pride chicken-processing plant in Mount Pleasant, which in 2012 dumped 2.8 million pounds of toxic chemicals into the Tankersley River in Northeast Texas. Working on these issues in Texas isnt easy, with powerful polluter lobbies that are used to getting what they want from state legislators and regulators. The entirely feasible way to promote solutions to the presidential ter m and win is by forming an organization. Starting small and accordingly expanding by getting to a greater extent and more concerned citizens involved would go a long way. The organization would have to build traction and earn its place amongst the large companies and government agencies. The citizens, once organized into a force could boycott companies not in compliance with EPA or the communitys standards, sue large corporations for any number of shortcomings, and in short make change happen. The people hold more power unitedly than they ever do individually and it will take cooperation on an sinful scale for such an idea to exist.There are five main U.S. environmental laws. These include the Clean Air Act which divides the country into air quality regions and sets goals for the concentration of various pollutants in the air. After that is the Clean wet Act, its goals are to eliminate discharge of all pollutants and to restore and maintain the quality of the nations waters so t hey are fishable and swimmable. Another is the Safe Drinking water supply Act which is in place to ensure water is consumable and looks clean. The SDWA also protects the quality of underground water sources. Next comes the Resource Conservation and retrieval Act which manages the generation, storage, transport, treatment and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes from operating facilities, and downplay waste disposal to land. Finally, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act covers the clean-up of delinquent hazardous waste sites and spills, and provides for community right-to-know of industrial waste management practices.Texas is unremarkably going head to head with the Environmental Protection Agency disceptation over a regulation of some manner. The EPA usually is the winner in these arguments from limits on greenhouse gas emissions to restrictions on air pollution that crosses state lines. During the Obama administration Texas, has sued the E PA and the federal government more than 50 times over environmental concerns. These lawsuits seem petty and wasteful of tax payers money to some. spell others are glad that Texas is still up for sticking it to big government and making sure that they are not over reaching on boundaries trying to use powers that congress has not given them. Texas is continuously in court with the EPA because the EPA is encroaching on Texass management of air quality standards. The EPA is only doing so because Texas is doing the bare tokenish to reduce pollution. It is doing what is required within the regulations so that it remains in compliance with the acts. However, it is still so little that then the EPA has to try and force Texas to do more than just the bare minimum and that invokes a lawsuit because they do not have jurisdiction to do such a thing. It is asinine and a poor representation of what our state government is capable of but with all of the major corporations backing the state Texas will continue in this manner. Congress would need to amend the acts to give the EPA more power in the matter. This however, is unlikely because that would-be encroachment on states rights. The fact of the matter is the Texas Government does not want to do it so therefore it will do everything in its power not to. Unless a major power switch were to occur or perhaps a major push via the citizens of Texas this charade will continue. It all amounts to unnecessary outgo just to allow big business freedom to do as it wishes at the cost of the populations health and in increase in their pocket book size.Texas would much rather figure out its environmental issues on its own. A state set in its ways, it is not about to let the federal government have compete dictation over any of its policies. dependable or not Texas will conduct itself as it sees fit. Interference or forced control will meet opposition immediately at no consideration of expense. The wins Texas has acquired against the federal government has made it proud even though the losses fairly outweigh them. Texas may never deem with EPA on its regulations but the choices made by Texas now will more often than not effect environmental consequences for years to come.Works CitedDawson, B. (2010, August 5). Texas officials say they use implement EPAs climate rules. Retrieved from Texas Climate News http//texasclimatenews.org/?p=357EPA in Texas. (2016, December 23). Retrieved from EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency https//www.epa.gov/tx%20Everything You Need to distinguish About the EPA. (2017). Retrieved from StateImpact https//stateimpact.npr.org/texas/tag/epa/History of the TCEQ and Its Predecessor Agencies. (2016, January 26). Retrieved from Texas Commision On Environmental Quality https//www.tceq.texas.gov/about/tceqhistory.htmlSatija, N. (2014, April 29). Supreme Courts Air Pollution Ruling Goes Against Texas. Retrieved from The Texas Tribune https//www.texastribune.org/2014/04/29/texa s-loses-fight-against-epa-air-pollution-rule/Satija, N., Carbonell, L., McCrimmon, R. (2017, January 17). Texas vs. the Feds A Look at the Lawsuits. Retrieved from The Texas Tribune https//www.texastribune.org/2017/01/17/texas-federal-government-lawsuits/The States Water by Region . (n.d.). Retrieved from Texas park Wildlife http//tpwd.texas.gov/landwater/water/environconcerns/regions/